BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Plskova, J
Right arrow Articles by Forrester, J V
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Plskova, J
Right arrow Articles by Forrester, J V
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2004;88:1209-1216
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


EXTENDED REPORT

Quantitative evaluation of the corneal endothelium in the mouse after grafting

J Plskova1,2,3, L Kuffova1, M Filipec2, V Holan3, J V Forrester1

1 Department of Ophthalmology, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
2 Department of Ophthalmology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
3 Institute of Molecular Genetics, Academy of Science, Prague, Czech Republic

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor J V Forrester
Department of Ophthalmology, Medical School, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK; j.forrester{at}abdn.ac.uk

Background/aim: Corneal graft survival depends critically on the quality of the endothelium. In this study the authors aimed to evaluate corneal endothelium in mice at different times after transplantation and to correlate endothelial integrity with corneal graft survival.

Methods: Syngeneic and allogeneic corneal grafts at various times (days 0–60) after engraftment were examined in flat mount preparation by confocal microscopy, by evaluating the hexagonal pattern of the endothelial monolayer using actin staining of the cell cortex. Corneas from untreated mice and from mice, who were grafted after removal of draining lymph nodes served as controls.

Results: In control corneas, more than 90% of the posterior surface was covered by endothelium. Syngeneic grafts were always covered by 54–99% of endothelium. In contrast, the posterior surface of corneal allografts showed great variation in the degree of endothelial cell coverage (0–98%). In addition, clinical opacity grading measure was not a reliable predictor of endothelial coverage.

Conclusion: In corneal allografts there is progressive loss of endothelium over time, unlike with syngeneic grafts. However, in the early stages of allograft rejection, the grade of graft opacity does not accurately reflect the degree of endothelial cell coverage. Although corneal opacity grade is considered the main determinant of graft rejection, the data suggest that both the grade of corneal opacity plus a sufficient post-graft time duration (>8 weeks in the mouse) are required for the diagnosis of irreversible graft rejection.


Abbreviations: eGFP, enhanced green fluorescence protein; LNR, lymph node removal; PBS, phosphate buffered saline; PFA, paraformaldehyde; tPA, tissue plasminogen activator

Keywords: corneal endothelial cells; corneal transplantation; actin; confocal microscopy







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.