BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pleyer, U.
Right arrow Articles by Krause, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pleyer, U.
Right arrow Articles by Krause, A.
Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:552-555 ( May )

Scientific correspondence

Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi DNA in urine of patients with ocular Lyme borreliosis Uwe Pleyera, Susanne Priemb, Lars Bergmanna, Gerd Burmesterb, Christian Hartmanna, Andreas Krauseb

a Department of Ophthalmology, Charité, Humboldt University, Campus Virchow Hospital, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany, b Department of Medicine, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité, Humboldt University, Campus Charité Mitte, Schumannstrasse 20/21, D-10098 Berlin

Correspondence to: Dr Uwe Pleyer uwe.pleyer{at}charite.de

Accepted for publication 13 December 2000

AIM---To evaluate the diagnostic value of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect Borrelia burgdorferi DNA in patients with ocular Lyme borreliosis.
METHODS---Of 256 consecutive uveitis patients six selected individuals with clinical evidence for Lyme borreliosis and 30 patients with non-Lyme uveitis were enrolled. Lyme serology was performed by ELISA and western blotting. Urine samples were examined by an optimised nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocol.
RESULTS---Only four of six uveitis patients suspected for Lyme borreliosis were ELISA positive, while all six subjects showed a positive western blot. B burgdorferi PCR was positive in all of these six patients. Whereas two of the 30 controls had a positive Lyme serology, B burgdorferi DNA was not detectable by PCR in any sample from these patients.
CONCLUSIONS---PCR for the detection of B burgdorferi DNA in urine of uveitis patients is a valuable tool to support the diagnosis of ocular Lyme borreliosis. Moreover, these patients often show a weak humoral immune response which may more sensitively be detected by immunoblotting.


© 2001 by British Journal of Ophthalmology






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2001 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.