BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frost, N A
Right arrow Articles by Sparrow, J M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frost, N A
Right arrow Articles by Sparrow, J M
Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:319-321 ( March )

The assessment of lens opacities in clinical practice: results of a national survey

N A Frost, J M Sparrow

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Bristol, UK

Correspondence to: Mr NA Frost, Bristol Eye Hospital, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol BS1 2LX, UK Andy.Frost{at}bristol.ac.uk

Accepted for publication 24 October 2000

AIM---To investigate the examination of lens opacities in routine ophthalmic clinical practice.
METHOD---A questionnaire survey was mailed to 703 consultant ophthalmologists in the UK. The surgeons were asked which lens feature(s) they assessed in their clinics when deciding whether to offer cataract surgery.
RESULTS---489 replies were received. A broad range of lens opacities was assessed, with differences between surgeons for some opacities with high prevalences in the population, particularly cortical opacities. Many (74% of 467) surgeons assessed one or more lens opacities (anterior subcapsular cataract, vacuoles, water clefts, coronary flakes, focal dots, retrodots, fibre folds) which may be visually important but which have received relatively little attention by researchers.
CONCLUSIONS---Some classes of lens opacity which are traditionally measured by researchers may be ignored in clinical practice and opacities which are traditionally ignored by some researchers are regarded as clinically important by a substantial number of surgeons.


© 2001 by British Journal of Ophthalmology



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
N. A. Frost, J. M. Sparrow, and L. Moore
Associations of Human Crystalline Lens Retrodots and Waterclefts with Visual Impairment: An Observational Study
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2002; 43(7): 2105 - 2109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2001 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.