BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuchar, A
Right arrow Articles by Steinkogler, F J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuchar, A
Right arrow Articles by Steinkogler, F J
Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:200-204 ( February )

Antegrade balloon dilatation of nasolacrimal duct obstruction in adults

A Kuchar, F J Steinkogler

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Vienna, Medical School, Vienna, Austria

Correspondence to: Dr A Kuchar, University Eye Clinic Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria andreas.kuchar{at}univie.ac.at

Accepted for publication 22 September 2000

AIMS---To determine the efficacy of antegrade balloon dilatation of postsaccal lacrimal stenosis in adults.
METHODS---Balloon dilatation was performed in a series of 30 patients with complete nasolacrimal duct obstructions and epiphora. Obstruction was diagnosed by canalicular irrigation and transcanalicular endoscopic examination of the lacrimal pathway. Except for four cases in which general anaesthesia was applied, the procedure was performed under local anaesthesia. The Lacricath balloon catheter set was used. Silicone intubation was performed simultaneously. The time at which the tubes were removed depended on the findings at postoperative follow up but was, at the earliest, 3 months postoperatively.
RESULTS---Success was objectified by irrigation and was evaluated subjectively at each follow up examination according to Munk's scale. In all cases the procedure could be performed with subsequent silicone intubation. Three months postoperatively 89.9% of all cases were positive on simple irrigation, and subjective success was also registered (Munk's grade 0 or 1). At 6 months 70% of all cases were positive on irrigation, again with subjective success (Munk's grade 0 or 1). One year postoperatively 73.3% of all procedures showed subjective success (two successful redilatations would raise the success rate to 79.9%).
CONCLUSION---Retrograde as well as antegrade dilatation has been reported to be more or less successful in partial nasolacrimal obstruction. Although the procedure is used as primary treatment in cases of complete obstruction, it can still be performed under local anaesthesia on an outpatient basis. Long term observation will be required to prove the sustained effect of this procedure.


© 2001 by British Journal of Ophthalmology



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
M S Bajaj, N Pushker, and S Ghose
Dacryocystorhinostomy for partial nasolacrimal obstruction
Br. J. Ophthalmol., September 1, 2002; 86(9): 1068 - 1068.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2001 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.