BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaye, S. B
Right arrow Articles by Brown, M. C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaye, S. B
Right arrow Articles by Brown, M. C
Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:193-199 ( February )

Modification of the tear function index and its use in the diagnosis of Sjögren's syndrome

Stephen B Kayea, Gillian Simsa, Colin Willoughbya, Anne E Fieldb, Lesley Longmanb, Malcolm C Brownc

a St Paul's Eye Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Prescot Street, Liverpool L12 2AP, UK, b Department of Oral Medicine, c Department of Clinical Engineering

Correspondence to: Mr S B Kaye suzannelee{at}rlbuh.tr.nwest.nhs.uk

Accepted for publication 16 June 2000

BACKGROUND---The tear function index (TFI) has been shown to be of value in the diagnosis of patients suffering from Sjögren's syndrome. It is dependent, however, on introducing into the conjunctival fornix the correct concentration of fluorescein in at least one and a half times the normal tear volume. The stimulus and effect of this added volume on the tear dynamics is likely to vary between individuals. These factors, together with the method of performing the test, limit its general applicability.
AIM---To devise a method of performing the TFI with less variability and more general applicability. To present a theoretical and in vitro assessment of the dynamics of the TFI.
METHOD---The study was divided into three parts. The first part was to compare the results obtained using a prepared strip containing 1.3 µl of 0.5% fluorescein with the introduction of the same amount of fluorescein as a drop. The second part was to compare the results obtained with prepared strips with the standard method of performing the TFI, both with and without topical anaesthetic. The third part was an in vitro study of the rate of flow of graded volumes on a filter paper strip. 42 subjects with a diagnosis of Sjögren's syndrome according to the European criteria and 126 without Sjögren's syndrome were included.
RESULTS---There was no significant difference between the results obtained with a prepared strip and the introduction of 1.3 µl into the eye before performing the Schirmer's test and TFI (0.1<p<0.93). There was, likewise, no significant difference between using the prepared strips and the standard method of performing the TFI (0.36<p<0.93). There was, however, less interocular difference (p=0.01) and variability (p=0.001) using the prepared strips than using a drop of fluorescein. Patients with Sjögren's syndrome had mean TFIs of 11.7 and 8.61 with upper 95% confidence values of 15 and 12 without and with topical anaesthetic, respectively. The theoretical calculation of the TFI was similar to the observed values. The in vitro results allow the filter paper to be removed from the eye at any interval and to estimate the volume of tears that the filter paper was in contact with.
CONCLUSION---The proposed method of performing the TFI is easy to perform, reliable, and therefore has general applicability for primary care and general practitioners. It allows the rapid identification of subjects who may be suffering from Sjögren's syndrome.


© 2001 by British Journal of Ophthalmology






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2001 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.