Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:193-199
( February )
Modification of the tear function index and its use in the
diagnosis of Sjögren's syndrome
Stephen B Kayea, Gillian Simsa, Colin Willoughbya, Anne E Fieldb, Lesley Longmanb, Malcolm C Brownc
a St Paul's Eye Unit,
Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Prescot Street, Liverpool L12
2AP, UK, b Department of Oral Medicine, c Department of Clinical
Engineering
Correspondence to: Mr S B
Kaye
suzannelee{at}rlbuh.tr.nwest.nhs.uk
Accepted for publication 16 June 2000
BACKGROUND
The tear
function index (TFI) has been shown to be of value in the diagnosis of
patients suffering from Sjögren's syndrome. It is dependent,
however, on introducing into the conjunctival fornix the correct
concentration of fluorescein in at least one and a half times the
normal tear volume. The stimulus and effect of this added volume on the
tear dynamics is likely to vary between individuals. These factors,
together with the method of performing the test, limit its general applicability.
AIM
To devise a method
of performing the TFI with less variability and more general
applicability. To present a theoretical and in vitro assessment of the
dynamics of the TFI.
METHOD
The study was
divided into three parts. The first part was to compare the results
obtained using a prepared strip containing 1.3 µl of 0.5%
fluorescein with the introduction of the same amount of fluorescein as
a drop. The second part was to compare the results obtained with
prepared strips with the standard method of performing the TFI, both
with and without topical anaesthetic. The third part was an in vitro
study of the rate of flow of graded volumes on a filter paper strip. 42 subjects with a diagnosis of Sjögren's syndrome according to the
European criteria and 126 without Sjögren's syndrome were included.
RESULTS
There was no
significant difference between the results obtained with a prepared
strip and the introduction of 1.3 µl into the eye before
performing the Schirmer's test and TFI (0.1<p<0.93). There was,
likewise, no significant difference between using the prepared strips
and the standard method of performing the TFI (0.36<p<0.93). There
was, however, less interocular difference (p=0.01) and variability
(p=0.001) using the prepared strips than using a drop of fluorescein.
Patients with Sjögren's syndrome had mean TFIs of 11.7 and 8.61 with
upper 95% confidence values of 15 and 12 without and with topical
anaesthetic, respectively. The theoretical calculation of the TFI was
similar to the observed values. The in vitro results allow the filter
paper to be removed from the eye at any interval and to estimate the
volume of tears that the filter paper was in contact with.
CONCLUSION
The
proposed method of performing the TFI is easy to perform, reliable, and
therefore has general applicability for primary care and general
practitioners. It allows the rapid identification of subjects who may
be suffering from Sjögren's syndrome.
© 2001 by British Journal of Ophthalmology