BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ma, D. H.-K.
Right arrow Articles by Tsai, R. J.-F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ma, D. H.-K.
Right arrow Articles by Tsai, R. J.-F.
Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:973-978 ( September )

Amniotic membrane graft for primary pterygium: comparison with conjunctival autograft and topical mitomycin C treatment

David Hui-Kang Maa, Lai-Chu Seeb, Su-Bin Liaua, Ray Jui-Fang Tsaia

a Department of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan, b Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan

Correspondence to: Ray Jui-Fang Tsai, 2F 350 Section 4 Cheng Kung Road, Taipei, Taiwan, 114 raytsai{at}ms4.hinet.net

Accepted for publication 18 April 2000

AIM---To study the efficacy and safety of amniotic membrane graft as an adjunctive therapy after removal of primary pterygium, and to compare the clinical outcome with conjunctival autograft and topical mitomycin C.
METHODS---80 eyes of 71 patients with primary pterygia were treated with excision followed by amniotic membrane graft. The result was compared retrospectively with 56 eyes of 50 patients receiving conjunctival autograft, and 54 eyes of 46 patients receiving topical mitomycin C. Patients were followed for at least 6 months, and the averaged follow up periods for the three groups were 13.8, 22.8, and 18.4 months, respectively.
RESULTS---There were three recurrences (3.8%) in the amniotic membrane graft group, three recurrences (5.4%) in the conjunctival autograft group, and two recurrences (3.7%) in the topical mitomycin C group. There was no significant difference in recurrence rate among the three groups (p = 0.879). No major complications occurred in the amniotic membrane graft group or the conjunctival autograft group. One case of infectious scleritis due to scleral ischaemia occurred in the topical mitomycin C group.
CONCLUSION---This study showed that amniotic membrane graft was as effective as conjunctival autograft and mitomycin C in preventing pterygium recurrence, and can be considered as a preferred grafting procedure for primary pterygium.


© 2000 by British Journal of Ophthalmology



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
P Luanratanakorn, T Ratanapakorn, O Suwan-apichon, and R S Chuck
Randomised controlled study of conjunctival autograft versus amniotic membrane graft in pterygium excision
Br. J. Ophthalmol., December 1, 2006; 90(12): 1476 - 1480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
F Raiskup, A Solomon, D Landau, M Ilsar, and J Frucht-Pery
Mitomycin C for pterygium: long term evaluation
Br. J. Ophthalmol., November 1, 2004; 88(11): 1425 - 1428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
A L Young, G Y S Leung, A K K Wong, L L Cheng, and D S C Lam
A randomised trial comparing 0.02% mitomycin C and limbal conjunctival autograft after excision of primary pterygium
Br. J. Ophthalmol., August 1, 2004; 88(8): 995 - 997.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
S B Anderson, R F. de Souza, C Hofmann-Rummelt, and B Seitz
Corneal calcification after amniotic membrane transplantation
Br. J. Ophthalmol., May 1, 2003; 87(5): 587 - 591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2000 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.