BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dandona, L.
Right arrow Articles by Rao, G. N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dandona, L.
Right arrow Articles by Rao, G. N
Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:706-709 ( July )

Population based assessment of uveitis in an urban population in southern India

Lalit Dandonaa, Rakhi Dandonaa b, Rajesh K Johna, Catherine A McCartyb, Gullapalli N Raoa

a Public Health Ophthalmology Service, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India, b Centre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

Correspondence to: Lalit Dandona, MD, MPH, Public Health Ophthalmology Service, LV Prasad Eye Institute, LV Prasad Marg, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad - 500 034, India dandona{at}lvpeye.stph.net

Accepted for publication 12 January 2000

AIM---To assess the prevalence of active and inactive uveitis unrelated to previous surgery or trauma in an urban population in southern India.
METHODS---As part of the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study, 2522 subjects (85.4% of those eligible), a sample representative of the population of Hyderabad city in southern India, underwent interview and detailed dilated eye examination. Presence of sequelae of uveitis without current active inflammation was defined as inactive uveitis.
RESULTS---Unequivocal evidence of active or inactive uveitis unrelated to previous surgery or trauma was present in 21 subjects, an age-sex adjusted prevalence of 0.73% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-1.14%). Active uveitis was present in eight subjects, an age-sex adjusted prevalence of 0.37% (95% CI 0.19-0.70), of which 0.06% was anterior, 0.25% intermediate, and 0.06% posterior. The 0.36% (95% CI 0.17-0.68%) prevalence of inactive uveitis included macular chorioretinitis scars (0.26%), anterior (0.07%) and previous vasculitis involving the whole eye (0.03%). The prevalence of visual impairment due to uveitis of less than 6/18 in at least one eye was 0.27%, less than 6/60 in at least one eye was 0.16%, and less than 6/60 in both eyes was 0.03%.
CONCLUSION---These population based cross sectional data give an estimate of the prevalence of various types of uveitis in this urban population in India. Active or past uveitis that might need treatment at some stage was present in one of every 140 people in this population.


© 2000 by British Journal of Ophthalmology



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
O M Durrani, N N Tehrani, J E Marr, P Moradi, P Stavrou, and P I Murray
Degree, duration, and causes of visual loss in uveitis
Br. J. Ophthalmol., September 1, 2004; 88(9): 1159 - 1162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
J. R. Smith, D. T. Franc, N. S. Carter, D. Zamora, S. R. Planck, and J. T. Rosenbaum
Susceptibility of Retinal Vascular Endothelium to Infection with Toxoplasma gondii Tachyzoites
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2004; 45(4): 1157 - 1161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
R Maini, J O'Sullivan, A Reddy, S Watson, and C Edelsten
The risk of complications of uveitis in a district hospital cohort
Br. J. Ophthalmol., April 1, 2004; 88(4): 512 - 517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2000 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.