Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:626-630
( June )
Mine blast injuries: ocular and social aspects
Waqar Muzaffara, Muhammad Dawood Khana b, M K Akbara, Mohammad Daud Khana b, Abdul Majeed Malika, Omar M Durranic
a Eye Department,
Combined Military Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan, b Postgraduate Medical Institute, Department of
Ophthalmology, University of Peshawar, Pakistan, c Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, Division of
Immunity and Infection, University of Birmingham
Correspondence to: Dr Waqar Muzaffar, Combined Military Hospital, Okara, Punjab,
Pakistan mzffrs{at}apollo.net.pk
Accepted for publication 10 February 2000
BACKGROUND/AIMS
Landmines
have long been used in conventional warfare. These are antipersonnel
mines which continue to injure people long after a ceasefire without
differentiating between friend or foe, soldier or civilian, women or
children. This study focuses on Afghan non-combatants engaged in mine
clearing operations in Afghanistan in the aftermath of the Russo-Afghan
war. The patterns and types of injuries seen are described and
experiences in their management, ways, and means to prevent them, and
recommendations for the rehabilitation of the affected individuals are given.
METHODS
It is a
retrospective and analytical study of 84 patients aged 19-56 years who
sustained mine blast injuries during mine clearing operations in
Afghanistan from November 1992 to January 1996. The study was carried
out at a military hospital with tertiary care facilities. The patients
were divided into three groups on the basis of their injuries. Group 1 required only general surgical attention, group 2 sustained only ocular
injuries, while group 3 had combined ocular and general injuries.
Patients in groups 2 and 3 were treated in two phases. The first phase
aimed at immediate restoration of the anatomy, while restoration of
function wherever possible was done in subsequent surgical procedures
in the second phase.
RESULTS
It was
observed that 51 out of 84 patients (60.7%) had sustained ocular
trauma of a variable degree as a result of the blasts. The mean age of
the victims was 29 years and they were all male. A total of 91 eyes of
51 patients (89.2%) had been damaged. Bilaterality of damage was seen
in 40 (78.4%) patients. Most, 34 (37.3%), eyes became totally blind
(NPL). Only a few escaped with injury mild enough not to impair vision.
Foreign bodies, small and multiple, were found in the majority of eyes;
most, however, were found in the anterior segment, and posterior
segment injuries were proportionally less.
CONCLUSIONS
The
prevalence of blindness caused by mine blast injuries is quite high.
The resulting psychosocial trauma to the patients and their families is
tremendous and has not been adequately highlighted. These injuries are
a great drain on the country's resources. Enforcement of preventive
measures and the use of protective gear and sophisticated equipment by
the mine clearing personnel would prove to be far more economical in
terms of human life as well as medical and economic resources. There is
also need for greater attention towards the establishment of support
groups and rehabilitation programmes for these individuals.
© 2000 by British Journal of Ophthalmology