BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nordmann, J.-P.
Right arrow Articles by the Swedish Latanoprost Study Group,
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nordmann, J.-P.
Right arrow Articles by the Swedish Latanoprost Study Group,
Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:181-185 ( February )

Comparison of the intraocular pressure lowering effect of latanoprost and a fixed combination of timolol-pilocarpine eye drops in patients insufficiently controlled with beta  adrenergic antagonists

Jean-Philippe Nordmanna, Mats Söderströmb, Jean-François Roulandc d, François Malecaze, the French Latanoprost Study Group, and the Swedish Latanoprost Study Group

a Department of Ophthalmology, Hôpital des Quinze-Vingts, Paris, France, b Department of Ophthalmology, Huddinge University Hospital, Sweden, c Department of Ophthalmology, Hôpital Huriez, Lille, France, d Department of Ophthalmology, Hôpital Purpan, Toulouse, France

Correspondence to: Jean-Philippe Nordmann, MD, PhD, Department of Ophthalmology, Hôpital des Quinze-Vingts, 28 rue de Charenton, 75012 Paris, France

Accepted for publication 15 September 1999

AIMS---To compare the effect on intraocular pressure (IOP) of latanoprost monotherapy and timolol-pilocarpine in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension with inadequately controlled IOP on topical beta  adrenergic antagonists.
METHODS---This was a multicentre, randomised, observer masked, 6 week study performed in France and Sweden. 23 centres enrolled 237 patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension and an IOP of at least 22 mm Hg on treatment with topical beta  adrenergic antagonists, alone or in combination. After a 21 day run in period on timolol 0.5% twice daily, patients were randomised either to latanoprost 0.005% once daily or to a fixed combination of timolol-pilocarpine twice daily. Changes in mean diurnal IOP from the baseline to the 6 week visit were determined with an analysis of covariance.
RESULTS---Mean diurnal IOP was statistically significantly decreased from baseline in both groups (p<0.001). Switching to latanoprost treatment reduced mean diurnal IOP by 5.4 (SEM 0.3) mm Hg (ANCOVA -22%) and switching to timolol-pilocarpine treatment reduced mean diurnal IOP by 4.9 (0.4) mm Hg (-20%). Blurred vision, decreased visual acuity, decreased twilight vision, and headache were statistically significantly more frequent in the timolol-pilocarpine group.
CONCLUSIONS---Latanoprost monotherapy was at least as effective as fixed combination timolol-pilocarpine twice daily treatment in reducing mean diurnal IOP in patients not adequately controlled on topical beta  adrenergic antagonists. Latanoprost was better tolerated than timolol-pilocarpine regarding side effects. These results indicate that a switch to latanoprost monotherapy can be attempted before combination therapy is initiated.


© 2000 by British Journal of Ophthalmology



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
L E Pillunat and L-I Larsson
Intraocular pressure after replacement of current dual therapy with latanoprost monotherapy in patients with open angle glaucoma
Br. J. Ophthalmol., December 1, 2003; 87(12): 1492 - 1496.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2000 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.