Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:130-134
( February )
Non-ophthalmologist screening for retinopathy of prematurity
Richard A Saundersa, Margaret L Donahueb, Jerry E Berlanda, Eric L Robertsa, Billy Von Powersa, Philip F Rustc
a N Edgar Miles Center
for Pediatric Ophthalmology, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of
South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, b Department of Pediatrics, c Department of Biometry and Epidemiology
Correspondence to: Richard A Saunders,
MD, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina,
167 Ashley Avenue, Charleston, SC 29425-2236, USA
Accepted for publication 28 September 1999
AIM
To determine if a
non-ophthalmologist can accurately screen for retinopathy of
prematurity (ROP) by evaluating the posterior pole blood vessels of the
retina. ROP is a common ocular disorder of premature infants and may
require multiple screening examinations by an ophthalmologist to allow
for timely intervention. Since there is a strong correlation between
posterior pole vascular abnormalities and vision threatening ROP,
screening examinations performed by non-ophthalmologist may yield
useful clinical information in high risk infants.
METHODS
Infants born
at the Medical University of South Carolina who met screening criteria
(n = 142) were examined by a single non-ophthalmologist using a direct
ophthalmoscope to evaluate the posterior pole blood vessels for
abnormalities of the venules and/or arterioles. To determine the
accuracy of the non-ophthalmologist's clinical observations, infants
were also examined by an ophthalmologist, using an indirect ophthalmoscope, who graded the posterior pole vessels as normal, dilated venules, or dilated and tortuous venules and arterioles (including "plus disease").
RESULTS
There was
significant correlation (p <0.001) between the non-ophthalmologist's
and ophthalmologist's diagnoses of posterior pole vascular
abnormalities. 47 infants had normal posterior pole blood vessels by
the non-ophthalmologist examination. Of these, 31 (66%) were
considered to have normal vessels and 16 (34%) to have dilated venules
by the ophthalmologist. The non-ophthalmologist correctly identified
abnormal posterior pole vessels in all 21 infants diagnosed with
abnormal arterioles and venules by the ophthalmologist. No infants with
clinically important ROP ("prethreshold" or worse) would have
failed detection by this screening method.
CONCLUSION
Using a
direct ophthalmoscope, a non-ophthalmologist can screen premature
infants at risk for ROP by evaluating the posterior pole blood vessels
of the retina. While not necessarily recommended for routine clinical
practice, this technique may nevertheless be of value to those
situations where ophthalmological consultation is unavailable or
difficult to obtain.
© 2000 by British Journal of Ophthalmology