Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:1046-1049
( September )
Treatment of retinal tears and lattice degenerations in fellow
eyes in high risk patients suffering retinal detachment: a prospective
study
Leonardo Mastropasqua, Paolo Carpineto, Marco Ciancaglini, Gennaro Falconio, Pier E Gallenga
Institute of
Ophthalmology and Legal Medicine, University "G D'Annunzio",
Chieti, Italy
Correspondence to: Professor Leonardo Mastropasqua, viale Europa 23, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Accepted for publication 29 April 1999
BACKGROUND/AIMS
Fellow
eye prophylaxis for retinal detachment (RD) is still a controversial
issue since opinions are not unanimous regarding the kind of lesions to
be treated or the method of treatment. This prospective clinical study
aimed to follow the course of vitreoretinal conditions in 150 high risk
fellow eyes.
METHODS
150
consecutive patients with unilateral rhegmatogenous RD were included in
this study. Inclusion criteria were good explorability of fellow eye
retinal periphery and one of the following conditions in the fellow
eye
aphakia, pseudophakia with capsulotomy, high myopia (>
6D),
contralateral eye to a giant retinal tear. Prophylactic treatment
(photocoagulation or scleral buckling) was performed in the presence of
retinal tears and lattice degenerations. The state of the vitreous body
was determined at the beginning of the study and at the end, when RD occurred.
RESULTS
Follow up
ranged from 36 to 132 months. 95 fellow eyes were subjected to laser
treatment; five eyes underwent prophylactic surgical treatment.
Initially, in the treated group posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) was
present in 100 eyes (100% of cases), but as a complete PVD only in 42 of them (42%). 10 eyes in the treated group developed RD
during the follow up period. In five of these cases
the partial PVD had progressed and a retinal tear in a previously
healthy area was the cause of the retinal detachment. In the other five
eyes RD apparently developed from previously treated lesions.
Progression of PVD was evident in four out of these five eyes. The
untreated eyes had no visible degenerative lesions. During follow up
eight eyes developed RD. These eyes had no PVD at the beginning of the
study, but showed a partial PVD at the time of the diagnosis of RD.
CONCLUSION
Fellow eyes
with pre-existing retinal tears and PVDs can go on to retinal
detachment in spite of laser prophylactic treatment. When PVD is not
detectable or a partial PVD is present, the progression of posterior
vitreous separation can account for retinal tears and RDs arising in
formerly healthy areas.
© 1999 by British Journal of Ophthalmology