BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Pflugfelder, S. C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Pflugfelder, S. C
Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:774-778 ( July )

Evaluation of corneal thickness and topography in normal eyes using the Orbscan corneal topography system

Zuguo Liua b, Andrew J Huanga, Stephen C Pflugfeldera

a Ocular Surface and Tear Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, USA, b Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University of Medical Sciences. Guangzhou 510060, P R China

Correspondence to: Stephen C Pflugfelder, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, 900 NW 17th Street, Miami, FL 33136, USA.

Accepted for publication 13 January 1999

AIMS---To map the thickness, elevation (anterior and posterior corneal surface), and axial curvature of the cornea in normal eyes with the Orbscan corneal topography system.
METHODS---94 eyes of 51 normal subjects were investigated using the Orbscan corneal topography system. The anterior and posterior corneal elevation maps were classified into regular ridge, irregular ridge, incomplete ridge, island, and unclassified patterns, and the axial power maps were grouped into round, oval, symmetric bow tie, asymmetric bow tie, and irregular patterns. The pachymetry patterns were designated as round, oval, decentred round, and decentred oval.
RESULTS---The thinnest point on the cornea was located at an average of 0.90 (SD 0.51) mm from visual axis and had an average thickness of 0.55 (0.03) mm. In 69.57% of eyes, this point was located in the inferotemporal quadrant, followed by the superotemporal quadrant in 23.91%, the inferonasal quadrant in 4.35%, and the superonasal quadrant in 2.17%. Among the nine regions of the cornea evaluated (central, superotemporal, temporal, inferotemporal, inferior, inferonasal, nasal, superonasal, and superior) the central cornea had the lowest average thickness (0.56 (0.03) mm) and the superior cornea had the greatest average thickness (0.64 (0.03) mm). The mean simulated keratometry (SimK) was 44.24 (1.61)/43.31 (1.66) dioptres (D) and the mean astigmatism was 0.90 (0.41) D. Island (71.74%) was the most common elevation pattern observed in the anterior corneal surface, followed by incomplete ridge (19.57%), regular ridge (4.34%), irregular ridge (2.17%), and unclassified (2.17%). Island (32.61%) was the most common topographic pattern in the posterior corneal surface, following by regular ridge (30.43%), incomplete ridge (23.91%), and irregular ridge (13.04%) patterns. Symmetric bow tie was the most common axial power pattern in the anterior cornea (39.13%), followed by oval (26.07%), asymmetric bow tie (23.91%), round (6.52%), and irregular (4.53%) patterns. In the pachymetry maps, 47.83% of eyes had an oval pattern, and round, decentred oval, and decentred round were observed in 41.30%, 8.70%, and 2.18% of eyes, respectively.
CONCLUSION---The information on regional corneal thickness, corneal elevation and axial corneal curvature obtained with the Orbscan corneal topography system from normal eyes provides a reference for comparison with diseased corneas. The Orbscan corneal topography system is a useful tool to evaluate both corneal topography and corneal thickness.


© 1999 by British Journal of Ophthalmology



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
K Kawana, T Tokunaga, K Miyata, F Okamoto, T Kiuchi, and T Oshika
Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using Orbscan II, non-contact specular microscopy, and ultrasonic pachymetry in eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis
Br. J. Ophthalmol., April 1, 2004; 88(4): 466 - 468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
A Muller, J P Craig, C N Grupcheva, and C N J McGhee
The effects of corneal parameters on the assessment of endothelial cell density in the elderly eye
Br. J. Ophthalmol., March 1, 2004; 88(3): 325 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
S. Sonego-Krone, G. Lopez-Moreno, O. V. Beaujon-Balbi, C. G. Arce, P. Schor, and M. Campos
A Direct Method to Measure the Power of the Central Cornea After Myopic Laser In Situ Keratomileusis
Arch Ophthalmol, February 1, 2004; 122(2): 159 - 166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
N Sharma, A Rani, R Balasubramanya, R B Vajpayee, and R M Pandey
Posterior corneal topographic changes after partial flap during laser in situ keratomileusis
Br. J. Ophthalmol., February 1, 2003; 87(2): 160 - 162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
G. Sultan, C. Baudouin, O. Auzerie, M. De Saint Jean, M. Goldschild, and P.-J. Pisella
Cornea in Marfan Disease: Orbscan and In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Analysis
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2002; 43(6): 1757 - 1764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
M. Vetrugno, N. Cardascia, and L. Cardia
Anterior chamber depth measured by two methods in myopic and hyperopic phakic IOL implant
Br. J. Ophthalmol., October 1, 2000; 84(10): 1113 - 1116.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 1999 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.