BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spry, P G D
Right arrow Articles by Easty, D L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spry, P G D
Right arrow Articles by Easty, D L
Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:707-712 ( June )

The Bristol Shared Care Glaucoma Study: reliability of community optometric and hospital eye service test measures

P G D Sprya b, I C Spencera, J M Sparrowa, T J Petersc, S T Brookesc, S Grayc, I Bakerd, J E Furbere, D L Eastya

a Department of Ophthalmology, University of Bristol, Bristol, b Discoveries in Sight, Devers Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA, c Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, d Avon Health Authority, Bristol, e Bristol Eye Hospital, Bristol

Correspondence to: Dr P G D Spry, Discoveries in Sight, Devers Eye Institute, Legacy Clinical Research and Technology Center, 1225 NE 2nd Avenue, Portland, Oregon, 97208, USA.

Accepted for publication 18 December 1998

BACKGROUND/AIMS---Primary open angle glaucoma patients and glaucoma suspects make up a considerable proportion of outpatient ophthalmological attendances and require lifelong review. Community optometrists can be suitably trained for assessment of glaucoma. This randomised controlled trial aims to assess the ability of community optometrists in the monitoring of this group of patients.
METHODS---Measures of cup to disc ratio, visual field score, and intraocular pressure were taken by community optometrists, the hospital eye service and a research clinic reference "gold" standard in 405 stable glaucoma patients and ocular hypertensives. Agreement between and within the three centres was assessed using mean differences and intraclass correlation coefficients. Tolerance limits for a change in status at the level of individual pairs of measurements were also calculated.
RESULTS---Compared with a research clinic reference standard, measurements made by community optometrists and those made in the routine hospital eye service were similar. Mean measurement differences and variability were similar across all three groups compared for each of the test variables (IOP, cup to disc ratio, and visual field). Overall, the visual field was found to be the most reliable measurement and the cup to disc ratio the least.
CONCLUSIONS---Trained community optometrists are able to make reliable measurements of the factors important in the assessment of glaucoma patients and glaucoma suspects. This clinical ability should allow those optometrists with appropriate training to play a role in the monitoring of suitable patients.


© 1999 by British Journal of Ophthalmology



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
British Journal of Visual ImpairmentHome page
E. J. Wallace, H. Paterson, S. Miller, A. Sinclair, R. Sanders, and A. Hinds
Patient profile and management in advanced glaucoma
British Journal of Visual Impairment, January 1, 2008; 26(1): 7 - 23.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
A Azuara-Blanco, J Burr, R Thomas, G Maclennan, and S McPherson
The accuracy of accredited glaucoma optometrists in the diagnosis and treatment recommendation for glaucoma
Br. J. Ophthalmol., December 1, 2007; 91(12): 1639 - 1643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
M Smith, A Frost, C M Graham, and S Shaw
Effect of pupillary dilatation on glaucoma assessments using optical coherence tomography
Br. J. Ophthalmol., December 1, 2007; 91(12): 1686 - 1690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
M J Banes, L E Culham, C Bunce, W Xing, A Viswanathan, and D Garway-Heath
Agreement between optometrists and ophthalmologists on clinical management decisions for patients with glaucoma
Br. J. Ophthalmol., May 1, 2006; 90(5): 579 - 585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
A M S Morley and I Murdoch
The future of glaucoma clinics
Br. J. Ophthalmol., May 1, 2006; 90(5): 640 - 645.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
S F Riad, J K G Dart, and R J Cooling
Primary care and ophthalmology in the United Kingdom
Br. J. Ophthalmol., April 1, 2003; 87(4): 493 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
B. Parkin, G. Shuttleworth, M. Costen, and C. Davison
A comparison of stereoscopic and monoscopic evaluation of optic disc topography using a digital optic disc stereo camera
Br. J. Ophthalmol., November 1, 2001; 85(11): 1347 - 1351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
P. G. D. Spry, A. B. Bates, C. A. Johnson, and B. C. Chauhan
Simulation of Longitudinal Threshold Visual Field Data
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2000; 41(8): 2192 - 2200.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
S. F Gray, P. G D Spry, S. T Brookes, T. J Peters, I. C Spencer, I. A Baker, J. M Sparrow, and D. L Easty
The Bristol shared care glaucoma study: outcome at follow up at 2 years
Br. J. Ophthalmol., May 1, 2000; 84(5): 456 - 463.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
G N Shuttleworth, C H Khong, and J P Diamond
A new digital optic disc stereo camera: intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of optic disc measurements
Br. J. Ophthalmol., April 1, 2000; 84(4): 403 - 407.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 1999 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.