BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Azuara-Blanco, A.
Right arrow Articles by Augsburger, J. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Azuara-Blanco, A.
Right arrow Articles by Augsburger, J. J
Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:295-298 ( March )

Comparison between laser scanning tomography and computerised image analysis of the optic disc

Augusto Azuara-Blanco,a b George L Spaeth,b Jamie Nicholl,b Ines M Lanzl,b James J Augsburgerc

a Department of Ophthalmology Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, b Glaucoma Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, PA, USA, c Retina Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Correspondence to: Augusto Azuara-Blanco, MD, Department of Ophthalmology, B-Floor, South Block, Queen's Medical Centre, University Hospital, Nottingham NG7 2UH.

Accepted for publication 22 September 1998

AIMS---To study the interchangeability of the measurements of the optic disc topography obtained by one computerised image analyser and one confocal laser tomographic scanner.
METHODS---One eye of 28 patients with glaucoma or glaucoma suspects was studied. All cases had simultaneous stereoscopic disc photographs taken with the fundus camera Topcon TRC-SS and optic disc examination with the Heidelberg retina tomograph (HRT) during the same visit. The optic disc photographs were digitised and analysed with the Topcon ImageNet (TI) system. Three variables of the optic disc topography provided by the TI and the HRT were compared---cup volume (CV), rim area (RA), and cup area to disc area ratio (CA/DA).
RESULTS---The mean values of CV and RA provided by the TI (0.52 (SD 0.32) mm3 and 1.58 (0.39) mm2, respectively) were greater (p<0.01) than the mean values of CV and RA determined by the HRT (0.32 (0.25) mm3, and 1.33 (0.47) mm2, respectively). The mean value of CA/DA provided by the TI (0.42 (0.14)) and the HRT (0.42 (0.18)) was similar (p=0.93). Correlation coefficients between measurements obtained by the two methods ranged from 0.53 to 0.73.
CONCLUSION---There was a significant discrepancy in the measurements of rim area and cup volume of the optic disc obtained by a computerised image analyser and a laser scanning tomograph.

Keywords: optic disc; glaucoma; image analysis


© 1999 by British Journal of Ophthalmology






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 1999 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.