BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Velten, I. M
Right arrow Articles by Budde, W. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Velten, I. M
Right arrow Articles by Budde, W. M
Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:199-205 ( February )

Temporal contrast sensitivity with peripheral and central stimulation in glaucoma diagnosis

Isabel M Velten, Matthias Korth, Folkert K Horn, Wido M Budde

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany

Correspondence to: Dr Isabel M Velten, Augenklinik mit Poliklinik der Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Schwabachanlage 6, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany.

Accepted for publication 18 August 1998

AIMS---To evaluate temporal contrast sensitivity with full field, peripheral, and central stimulation and to determine the most sensitive corresponding retinal area for glaucoma damage.
METHODS---Temporal contrast sensitivity was determined either with a full field, a peripheral annular area from 30° to 90°, or a central area from 0° to 30° at a frequency of 37.1 Hz. 232 eyes of 232 subjects were included. They were classified into four groups: eyes with ocular hypertension (OHT, n = 54), "preperimetric" glaucomas (n = 73) with glaucomatous optic disc abnormalities but no visual field loss, "perimetric" glaucomas (n = 53) with visual field loss, and 52 normals.
RESULTS---In all four groups, temporal contrast senstitivity was almost equal with full field and peripheral, but significantly higher than with central stimulation (p <0.001). With regard to the diagnostic power of the three different stimulus areas, OHTs and glaucomas were found to be best discriminated from normals by peripheral stimulation.
CONCLUSIONS---According to these results, temporal contrast sensitivity seems to be determined by peripheral retinal areas. As the diagnostic power of the three different stimulus areas was best with the peripheral stimulation, this condition should be used for early glaucoma diagnosis.

Keywords: temporal contrast sensitivity; full field flicker; glaucoma; ocular hypertension


© 1999 by British Journal of Ophthalmology



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
P. Karwatsky, O. Overbury, and J. Faubert
Red-Green Chromatic Mechanisms in Normal Aging and Glaucomatous Observers
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2004; 45(8): 2861 - 2866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 1999 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.