Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:643-649 ( June )
Measurement of optic disc size: equivalence of methods to correct
for ocular magnification
D F Garway-Heath,a
A R Rudnicka,b
T Lowe,c
P J Foster,d
F W Fitzke,c
R A Hitchingsa
a Glaucoma Unit, Moorfields Eye
Hospital, London, b Applied Vision Research Centre, City University, London, c Institute of Ophthalmology, London, d Singapore
National Eye Centre, Republic of Singapore
Correspondence to: D F Garway-Heath, Glaucoma Unit,
Moorfields Eye Hospital, City Road, London EC1V 2PD.
Accepted for publication 9 January 1998
AIMS To compare methods available to correct the
magnification of images that result from the optics of the eye and
identify errors, and source of error, of the methods.
METHODS 11 methods were applied to ocular biometry
data from three independent cohorts. Each method was compared with the
method of Bennett, which uses most biometric data. The difference
between each method and Bennett's is the "error" of the method.
The relation between the error and axial length, ametropia, and
keratometry was explored by linear regression analysis.
RESULTS Methods using axial length had the lowest
mean (+0.5 to +2.6%) and standard deviation (0.6 to 1.2%) of errors.
Of methods using keratometry and ametropia only, the lowest mean
( 1.4% to +4.4%) and standard deviation (2.9 to 4.3%) of errors
was found for a new method described in this paper, and that used by
the Heidelberg retina tomograph (HRT). The highest mean error (+2.2 to
+7.1%) was found for Littmann's method. Littmann's correction was
larger than the HRT's by 3.5 to 3.7%. The mean difference between the
new and HRT methods and the "abbreviated axial length" method of
Bennett is 1.3 to +2.0%. The error of the "keratometry and
ametropia" methods is related to axial length.
CONCLUSIONS Methods using axial length are most
accurate. The abbreviated axial length method of Bennett differs little
from more detailed calculations and is appreciably more accurate than
methods using keratometry and ametropia alone. If axial length is
unknown, the new and the HRT methods give results closest to the
abbreviated axial length method.
Keywords:
Littmann;
magnification;
optic disc;
imaging
© 1998 by British Journal of Ophthalmology
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R R A Bourne, P J Foster, C Bunce, T Peto, R A Hitchings, P T Khaw, S K L Seah, and D F Garway-Heath
The morphology of the optic nerve head in the Singaporean Chinese population (the Tanjong Pagar study): part 1--optic nerve head morphology
Br. J. Ophthalmol.,
March 1, 2008;
92(3):
303 - 309.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R R A Bourne, P J Foster, C Bunce, T Peto, R A Hitchings, P T Khaw, S K L Seah, and D F Garway-Heath
The morphology of the optic nerve head in the Singaporean Chinese population (the Tanjong Pagar study): part 2--biometric and systemic associations
Br. J. Ophthalmol.,
March 1, 2008;
92(3):
310 - 314.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A Nagai-Kusuhara, M Nakamura, M Fujioka, Y Tatsumi, and A Negi
Association of retinal nerve fibre layer thickness measured by confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and optical coherence tomography with disc size and axial length
Br. J. Ophthalmol.,
February 1, 2008;
92(2):
186 - 190.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Cheung, L. Tong, G. Tikellis, S. M. Saw, P. Mitchell, J. J. Wang, and T. Y. Wong
Relationship of Retinal Vascular Caliber with Optic Disc Diameter in Children
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
November 1, 2007;
48(11):
4945 - 4948.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. K.-s. Leung, A. C. K. Cheng, K. K. L. Chong, K. S. Leung, S. Mohamed, C. S. L. Lau, C. Y. L. Cheung, G. C.-h. Chu, R. Y. K. Lai, C. C. P. Pang, et al.
Optic Disc Measurements in Myopia with Optical Coherence Tomography and Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
July 1, 2007;
48(7):
3178 - 3183.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. Bennett, A. W. Hewitt, J. L. Poulsen, L. S. Kearns, J. E. Morgan, J. E. Craig, and D. A. Mackey
Screening for Glaucomatous Disc Changes Prior to Diagnosis of Glaucoma in Myocilin Pedigrees
Arch Ophthalmol,
January 1, 2007;
125(1):
112 - 116.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y Wang, L Xu, L Zhang, H Yang, Y Ma, and J B Jonas
Optic disc size in a population based study in northern China: the Beijing Eye Study.
Br. J. Ophthalmol.,
March 1, 2006;
90(3):
353 - 356.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M M Hermann, I Theofylaktopoulos, N Bangard, C Jonescu-Cuypers, S Coburger, and M Diestelhorst
Optic nerve head morphometry in healthy adults using confocal laser scanning tomography
Br. J. Ophthalmol.,
June 1, 2004;
88(6):
761 - 765.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J G Crowston, C R Hopley, P R Healey, A Lee, and P Mitchell
The effect of optic disc diameter on vertical cup to disc ratio percentiles in a population based cohort: the Blue Mountains Eye Study
Br. J. Ophthalmol.,
June 1, 2004;
88(6):
766 - 770.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. F. Garway-Heath, M. J. Greaney, and J. Caprioli
Correction for the Erroneous Compensation of Anterior Segment Birefringence with the Scanning Laser Polarimeter for Glaucoma Diagnosis
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
May 1, 2002;
43(5):
1465 - 1474.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A B Cullinane, A Waldock, J P Diamond, and J M Sparrow
Optic disc cup slope and visual field indices in normal, ocular hypertensive and early glaucomatous eyes
Br. J. Ophthalmol.,
May 1, 2002;
86(5):
555 - 559.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J Santodomingo-Rubido, E A H Mallen, B Gilmartin, and J S Wolffsohn
A new non-contact optical device for ocular biometry
Br. J. Ophthalmol.,
April 1, 2002;
86(4):
458 - 462.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. F. GarwayHeath, J. Caprioli, F. W. Fitzke, and R. A. Hitchings
Scaling the Hill of Vision: The Physiological Relationship between Light Sensitivity and Ganglion Cell Numbers
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
June 1, 2000;
41(7):
1774 - 1782.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. Mansberger, P. A. Sample, L. Zangwill, and R. N. Weinreb
Achromatic and Short-Wavelength Automated Perimetry in Patients With Glaucomatous Large Cups
Arch Ophthalmol,
November 1, 1999;
117(11):
1473 - 1477.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. BENGTSSON;, D F GARWAY-HEATH, and R A HITCHINGS
Measurement of optic disc size
Br. J. Ophthalmol.,
February 1, 1999;
83(2):
252 - 252.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. F Garway-Heath, S. T Ruben, A. Viswanathan, and R. A Hitchings
Vertical cup/disc ratio in relation to optic disc size: its value in the assessment of the glaucoma suspect
Br. J. Ophthalmol.,
October 1, 1998;
82(10):
1118 - 1124.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
|
|