BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garway-Heath, D F
Right arrow Articles by Hitchings, R A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garway-Heath, D F
Right arrow Articles by Hitchings, R A
Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:643-649 ( June )

Measurement of optic disc size: equivalence of methods to correct for ocular magnification

D F Garway-Heath,a A R Rudnicka,b T Lowe,c P J Foster,d F W Fitzke,c R A Hitchingsa

a Glaucoma Unit, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, b Applied Vision Research Centre, City University, London, c Institute of Ophthalmology, London, d Singapore National Eye Centre, Republic of Singapore

Correspondence to: D F Garway-Heath, Glaucoma Unit, Moorfields Eye Hospital, City Road, London EC1V 2PD.

Accepted for publication 9 January 1998

AIMS---To compare methods available to correct the magnification of images that result from the optics of the eye and identify errors, and source of error, of the methods.
METHODS---11 methods were applied to ocular biometry data from three independent cohorts. Each method was compared with the method of Bennett, which uses most biometric data. The difference between each method and Bennett's is the "error" of the method. The relation between the error and axial length, ametropia, and keratometry was explored by linear regression analysis.
RESULTS---Methods using axial length had the lowest mean (+0.5 to +2.6%) and standard deviation (0.6 to 1.2%) of errors. Of methods using keratometry and ametropia only, the lowest mean (-1.4% to +4.4%) and standard deviation (2.9 to 4.3%) of errors was found for a new method described in this paper, and that used by the Heidelberg retina tomograph (HRT). The highest mean error (+2.2 to +7.1%) was found for Littmann's method. Littmann's correction was larger than the HRT's by 3.5 to 3.7%. The mean difference between the new and HRT methods and the "abbreviated axial length" method of Bennett is -1.3 to +2.0%. The error of the "keratometry and ametropia" methods is related to axial length.
CONCLUSIONS---Methods using axial length are most accurate. The abbreviated axial length method of Bennett differs little from more detailed calculations and is appreciably more accurate than methods using keratometry and ametropia alone. If axial length is unknown, the new and the HRT methods give results closest to the abbreviated axial length method.

Keywords: Littmann; magnification; optic disc; imaging


© 1998 by British Journal of Ophthalmology



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
R R A Bourne, P J Foster, C Bunce, T Peto, R A Hitchings, P T Khaw, S K L Seah, and D F Garway-Heath
The morphology of the optic nerve head in the Singaporean Chinese population (the Tanjong Pagar study): part 1--optic nerve head morphology
Br. J. Ophthalmol., March 1, 2008; 92(3): 303 - 309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
R R A Bourne, P J Foster, C Bunce, T Peto, R A Hitchings, P T Khaw, S K L Seah, and D F Garway-Heath
The morphology of the optic nerve head in the Singaporean Chinese population (the Tanjong Pagar study): part 2--biometric and systemic associations
Br. J. Ophthalmol., March 1, 2008; 92(3): 310 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
A Nagai-Kusuhara, M Nakamura, M Fujioka, Y Tatsumi, and A Negi
Association of retinal nerve fibre layer thickness measured by confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and optical coherence tomography with disc size and axial length
Br. J. Ophthalmol., February 1, 2008; 92(2): 186 - 190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
N. Cheung, L. Tong, G. Tikellis, S. M. Saw, P. Mitchell, J. J. Wang, and T. Y. Wong
Relationship of Retinal Vascular Caliber with Optic Disc Diameter in Children
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2007; 48(11): 4945 - 4948.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
C. K.-s. Leung, A. C. K. Cheng, K. K. L. Chong, K. S. Leung, S. Mohamed, C. S. L. Lau, C. Y. L. Cheung, G. C.-h. Chu, R. Y. K. Lai, C. C. P. Pang, et al.
Optic Disc Measurements in Myopia with Optical Coherence Tomography and Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2007; 48(7): 3178 - 3183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
S. L. Bennett, A. W. Hewitt, J. L. Poulsen, L. S. Kearns, J. E. Morgan, J. E. Craig, and D. A. Mackey
Screening for Glaucomatous Disc Changes Prior to Diagnosis of Glaucoma in Myocilin Pedigrees
Arch Ophthalmol, January 1, 2007; 125(1): 112 - 116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
Y Wang, L Xu, L Zhang, H Yang, Y Ma, and J B Jonas
Optic disc size in a population based study in northern China: the Beijing Eye Study.
Br. J. Ophthalmol., March 1, 2006; 90(3): 353 - 356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
M M Hermann, I Theofylaktopoulos, N Bangard, C Jonescu-Cuypers, S Coburger, and M Diestelhorst
Optic nerve head morphometry in healthy adults using confocal laser scanning tomography
Br. J. Ophthalmol., June 1, 2004; 88(6): 761 - 765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
J G Crowston, C R Hopley, P R Healey, A Lee, and P Mitchell
The effect of optic disc diameter on vertical cup to disc ratio percentiles in a population based cohort: the Blue Mountains Eye Study
Br. J. Ophthalmol., June 1, 2004; 88(6): 766 - 770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
D. F. Garway-Heath, M. J. Greaney, and J. Caprioli
Correction for the Erroneous Compensation of Anterior Segment Birefringence with the Scanning Laser Polarimeter for Glaucoma Diagnosis
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2002; 43(5): 1465 - 1474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
A B Cullinane, A Waldock, J P Diamond, and J M Sparrow
Optic disc cup slope and visual field indices in normal, ocular hypertensive and early glaucomatous eyes
Br. J. Ophthalmol., May 1, 2002; 86(5): 555 - 559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
J Santodomingo-Rubido, E A H Mallen, B Gilmartin, and J S Wolffsohn
A new non-contact optical device for ocular biometry
Br. J. Ophthalmol., April 1, 2002; 86(4): 458 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
D. F. Garway–Heath, J. Caprioli, F. W. Fitzke, and R. A. Hitchings
Scaling the Hill of Vision: The Physiological Relationship between Light Sensitivity and Ganglion Cell Numbers
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2000; 41(7): 1774 - 1782.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
S. L. Mansberger, P. A. Sample, L. Zangwill, and R. N. Weinreb
Achromatic and Short-Wavelength Automated Perimetry in Patients With Glaucomatous Large Cups
Arch Ophthalmol, November 1, 1999; 117(11): 1473 - 1477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
B. BENGTSSON;, D F GARWAY-HEATH, and R A HITCHINGS
Measurement of optic disc size
Br. J. Ophthalmol., February 1, 1999; 83(2): 252 - 252.
[Full Text]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
D. F Garway-Heath, S. T Ruben, A. Viswanathan, and R. A Hitchings
Vertical cup/disc ratio in relation to optic disc size: its value in the assessment of the glaucoma suspect
Br. J. Ophthalmol., October 1, 1998; 82(10): 1118 - 1124.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 1998 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.