Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:294-299 ( March )
A murine model of interlamellar corneal transplantation
Chun Ho Lau,a b
Susan M Nicholls,a
David L Eastyb
a Division of Ophthalmology, Medical School, University
of Bristol, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TD, b Division of Ophthalmology, Bristol Eye Hospital,
Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol BS1 2LX
Correspondence to: Dr Chun Ho Lau, Division of
Ophthalmology, Bristol Eye Hospital, Lower Maudlin Street,
Bristol BS1 2LX.
Accepted for publication 10 October 1997
AIMS/BACKGROUND
There are more reagents and
information available for immunological studies in the mouse
compared with other animals. Unfortunately, the mouse penetrating
keratoplasty model is associated with high background inflammation
which hinders study of the immune response to the graft. To mitigate
this drawback, a murine orthotopic corneal interlamellar
transplantation model with mild non-specific inflammation was developed.
METHODS
A 1.5 mm diameter full thickness donor
corneal button was placed in a 2 mm diameter recipient corneal
interlamellar pocket without placement of a suture. The clinical
course of graft status was studied daily for 60 days in 30 allografts
(donor strain CBA 101 (H-2k) to recipient NIH
(H-2q)) and 30 syngeneic grafts (NIH to NIH) by slit lamp
biomicroscopy and scored for neovascularisation, opacity, oedema, and
granularity. In another cohort of animals, histological observation was
performed after 30 minutes and on days 10, 20, 30, and 40 after
transplantation (four allografts and four syngeneic grafts per time
point). Histological study was also performed on grafts without donor
epithelium and on interlamellar pockets without grafts.
RESULTS
There was significantly more
neovascularisation (NV), opacity, oedema, and granularity in 24/30
allografts (80%) than in syngeneic grafts. Such grafts were defined as
rejected. The median time to rejection was 21 days (range 18 to >60
days). By histology, some allografts showed moderate to heavy cell
infiltration which correlated with clinical scores of NV (4-5),
opacity (1-3), oedema (1-3), and granularity (1-3). Such
infiltration was absent in other allografts and syngeneic grafts.
CONCLUSION
Surgically, corneal interlamellar
transplantation could be accomplished in the mouse and rejection could
be clearly defined. The model can therefore be useful for in situ study
of cell and molecular aspects of corneal graft rejection.
Keywords:
interlamellar keratoplasty;
corneal transplantation;
graft rejection;
mouse
© 1998 by British Journal of Ophthalmology