BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lau, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Easty, D. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lau, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Easty, D. L
Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:294-299 ( March )

A murine model of interlamellar corneal transplantation

Chun Ho Lau,a b Susan M Nicholls,a David L Eastyb

a Division of Ophthalmology, Medical School, University of Bristol, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TD, b Division of Ophthalmology, Bristol Eye Hospital, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol BS1 2LX

Correspondence to: Dr Chun Ho Lau, Division of Ophthalmology, Bristol Eye Hospital, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol BS1 2LX.

Accepted for publication 10 October 1997

AIMS/BACKGROUND---There are more reagents and information available for immunological studies in the mouse compared with other animals. Unfortunately, the mouse penetrating keratoplasty model is associated with high background inflammation which hinders study of the immune response to the graft. To mitigate this drawback, a murine orthotopic corneal interlamellar transplantation model with mild non-specific inflammation was developed.
METHODS---A 1.5 mm diameter full thickness donor corneal button was placed in a 2 mm diameter recipient corneal interlamellar pocket without placement of a suture. The clinical course of graft status was studied daily for 60 days in 30 allografts (donor strain CBA 101 (H-2k) to recipient NIH (H-2q)) and 30 syngeneic grafts (NIH to NIH) by slit lamp biomicroscopy and scored for neovascularisation, opacity, oedema, and granularity. In another cohort of animals, histological observation was performed after 30 minutes and on days 10, 20, 30, and 40 after transplantation (four allografts and four syngeneic grafts per time point). Histological study was also performed on grafts without donor epithelium and on interlamellar pockets without grafts.
RESULTS---There was significantly more neovascularisation (NV), opacity, oedema, and granularity in 24/30 allografts (80%) than in syngeneic grafts. Such grafts were defined as rejected. The median time to rejection was 21 days (range 18 to >60 days). By histology, some allografts showed moderate to heavy cell infiltration which correlated with clinical scores of NV (4-5), opacity (1-3), oedema (1-3), and granularity (1-3). Such infiltration was absent in other allografts and syngeneic grafts.
CONCLUSION---Surgically, corneal interlamellar transplantation could be accomplished in the mouse and rejection could be clearly defined. The model can therefore be useful for in situ study of cell and molecular aspects of corneal graft rejection.

Keywords: interlamellar keratoplasty; corneal transplantation; graft rejection; mouse


© 1998 by British Journal of Ophthalmology






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 1998 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.