Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:1424-1428 ( December )
Socioeconomic barriers to cataract surgery in Nepal: the south
Asian cataract management study
T Snellingen,a
B R Shrestha,b
M P Gharti,c
J K Shrestha,d
M P Upadhyay,d
R P Pokhrele
a Institutes of Clinical and
Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, Norway, b Ministry of Health, Ramshapath, Kathmandu, Nepal, c SACMS Programme Office, Institute of Medicine,
Kathmandu, Nepal, d BP Koirala
Lions Centre for Ophthalmic Studies, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu,
Nepal, e Nepal Netra
Jyothi Sangh, Nepal Eye Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
Correspondence to: Torkel Snellingen, MD, Institute of
Community Medicine, 9037 University of Tromsø, Norway.
Accepted for publication 3 June
1998
BACKGROUND Previous studies have shown that,
despite an increasing availability of cataract surgery, important
socioeconomic barriers exist in the acceptance of surgery in many rural
areas of south Asia. Nepal has developed a comprehensive national
network of eye hospitals but the surgical coverage for the treatment of
cataract blind is still low.
AIMS To determine the utilisation of cataract
surgery and the level of physical and psychosocial impairment and the
socioeconomic barriers to surgery in a group of non-acceptors of surgery.
METHODS Of 319 cataract patients identified in a
field screening 96 non-acceptors of surgery were interviewed 1 year
after an offer to undergo surgery. The interview included questions on
visual function, quality of life, and socioeconomic variables on
acceptance of cataract surgery. The quality of life questionnaire was
based on the field validated protocol addressing the impact of visual impairment on physical and psychosocial functions. The questionnaire was adapted to the local conditions after pretesting. Data were analysed by degree of visual impairment.
RESULTS Of 319 cataract patients identified only
45.5% accepted surgery, with men accepting surgery more readily than
women (RR=1.31; 95%CI=1.04-1.67) because of a significantly greater
acceptance of surgery in men in the non-blind group. The acceptance
rate was significantly higher in the blind group (RR=1.74;
95%CI=1.36-2.22) compared with those patients having impairment of
vision and severe loss of vision. Of 96 non-acceptors interviewed only
a further 13% accepted surgery after a second counselling. The most
frequent reasons given for not accepting surgery were economic (48%)
and logistical (44.8%) constraints followed by fear of surgery
(33.3%) and lack of time (18.8%). Half of the subjects complained of
problems with self care but only 10% needed help for their most basic
every day activities. 17.7% said they needed help to visit neighbours and 26% needed help to attend the field or market.
CONCLUSIONS It was found that in this population
with a majority of patients with severe vision loss and blind, even
when offered transport and free surgery the utilisation of cataract
surgery is below 60%. Medicine tends to be prescriptive based on
technological advances that it is able to offer. Medical practice needs
to develop a more holistic understanding of the needs of the
communities cultivating a greater capability to analyse the role of
cultural, social, and economic factors when planning medical services
for the population.
Keywords:
socioeconomic barriers;
cataract surgery;
cataract
management study
© 1998 by British Journal of Ophthalmology
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S Polack, H Kuper, Z Wadud, A Fletcher, and A Foster
Quality of life and visual impairment from cataract in Satkhira district, Bangladesh
Br. J. Ophthalmol.,
August 1, 2008;
92(8):
1026 - 1030.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N Congdon, S K Rao, K Choi, W Wang, S Lin, S Chen, L J Chen, K Liu, I C Hu, and D S C Lam
Sources of patient knowledge and financing of cataract surgery in rural China: the Sanrao Study of Cataract Outcomes and Up-Take of Services (SCOUTS), Report 6
Br. J. Ophthalmol.,
May 1, 2008;
92(5):
604 - 608.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. West
Poverty and Human Development: Not a Stretch for Ophthalmology
Arch Ophthalmol,
November 1, 2007;
125(11):
1564 - 1565.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H Limburg, A Foster, C Gilbert, G J Johnson, M Kyndt, and M Myatt
Routine monitoring of visual outcome of cataract surgery. Part 2: Results from eight study centres
Br. J. Ophthalmol.,
January 1, 2005;
89(1):
50 - 52.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M K Shrestha, J Thakur, C K Gurung, A B Joshi, S Pokhrel, and S Ruit
Willingness to pay for cataract surgery in Kathmandu valley
Br. J. Ophthalmol.,
March 1, 2004;
88(3):
319 - 320.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B Munoz and S K West
Blindness and visual impairment in the Americas and the Caribbean
Br. J. Ophthalmol.,
May 1, 2002;
86(5):
498 - 504.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. M Rabiu
Cataract blindness and barriers to uptake of cataract surgery in a rural community of northern Nigeria
Br. J. Ophthalmol.,
July 1, 2001;
85(7):
776 - 780.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|