BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Snellingen, T
Right arrow Articles by Pokhrel, R P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Snellingen, T
Right arrow Articles by Pokhrel, R P
Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:1424-1428 ( December )

Socioeconomic barriers to cataract surgery in Nepal: the south Asian cataract management study

T Snellingen,a B R Shrestha,b M P Gharti,c J K Shrestha,d M P Upadhyay,d R P Pokhrele

a Institutes of Clinical and Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, Norway, b Ministry of Health, Ramshapath, Kathmandu, Nepal, c SACMS Programme Office, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal, d BP Koirala Lions Centre for Ophthalmic Studies, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal, e Nepal Netra Jyothi Sangh, Nepal Eye Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal

Correspondence to: Torkel Snellingen, MD, Institute of Community Medicine, 9037 University of Tromsø, Norway.

Accepted for publication 3 June 1998

BACKGROUND---Previous studies have shown that, despite an increasing availability of cataract surgery, important socioeconomic barriers exist in the acceptance of surgery in many rural areas of south Asia. Nepal has developed a comprehensive national network of eye hospitals but the surgical coverage for the treatment of cataract blind is still low.
AIMS---To determine the utilisation of cataract surgery and the level of physical and psychosocial impairment and the socioeconomic barriers to surgery in a group of non-acceptors of surgery.
METHODS---Of 319 cataract patients identified in a field screening 96 non-acceptors of surgery were interviewed 1 year after an offer to undergo surgery. The interview included questions on visual function, quality of life, and socioeconomic variables on acceptance of cataract surgery. The quality of life questionnaire was based on the field validated protocol addressing the impact of visual impairment on physical and psychosocial functions. The questionnaire was adapted to the local conditions after pretesting. Data were analysed by degree of visual impairment.
RESULTS---Of 319 cataract patients identified only 45.5% accepted surgery, with men accepting surgery more readily than women (RR=1.31; 95%CI=1.04-1.67) because of a significantly greater acceptance of surgery in men in the non-blind group. The acceptance rate was significantly higher in the blind group (RR=1.74; 95%CI=1.36-2.22) compared with those patients having impairment of vision and severe loss of vision. Of 96 non-acceptors interviewed only a further 13% accepted surgery after a second counselling. The most frequent reasons given for not accepting surgery were economic (48%) and logistical (44.8%) constraints followed by fear of surgery (33.3%) and lack of time (18.8%). Half of the subjects complained of problems with self care but only 10% needed help for their most basic every day activities. 17.7% said they needed help to visit neighbours and 26% needed help to attend the field or market.
CONCLUSIONS---It was found that in this population with a majority of patients with severe vision loss and blind, even when offered transport and free surgery the utilisation of cataract surgery is below 60%. Medicine tends to be prescriptive based on technological advances that it is able to offer. Medical practice needs to develop a more holistic understanding of the needs of the communities cultivating a greater capability to analyse the role of cultural, social, and economic factors when planning medical services for the population.

Keywords: socioeconomic barriers; cataract surgery; cataract management study


© 1998 by British Journal of Ophthalmology



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
S Polack, H Kuper, Z Wadud, A Fletcher, and A Foster
Quality of life and visual impairment from cataract in Satkhira district, Bangladesh
Br. J. Ophthalmol., August 1, 2008; 92(8): 1026 - 1030.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
N Congdon, S K Rao, K Choi, W Wang, S Lin, S Chen, L J Chen, K Liu, I C Hu, and D S C Lam
Sources of patient knowledge and financing of cataract surgery in rural China: the Sanrao Study of Cataract Outcomes and Up-Take of Services (SCOUTS), Report 6
Br. J. Ophthalmol., May 1, 2008; 92(5): 604 - 608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
S. West
Poverty and Human Development: Not a Stretch for Ophthalmology
Arch Ophthalmol, November 1, 2007; 125(11): 1564 - 1565.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
H Limburg, A Foster, C Gilbert, G J Johnson, M Kyndt, and M Myatt
Routine monitoring of visual outcome of cataract surgery. Part 2: Results from eight study centres
Br. J. Ophthalmol., January 1, 2005; 89(1): 50 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
M K Shrestha, J Thakur, C K Gurung, A B Joshi, S Pokhrel, and S Ruit
Willingness to pay for cataract surgery in Kathmandu valley
Br. J. Ophthalmol., March 1, 2004; 88(3): 319 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
B Munoz and S K West
Blindness and visual impairment in the Americas and the Caribbean
Br. J. Ophthalmol., May 1, 2002; 86(5): 498 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
M. M Rabiu
Cataract blindness and barriers to uptake of cataract surgery in a rural community of northern Nigeria
Br. J. Ophthalmol., July 1, 2001; 85(7): 776 - 780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 1998 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.